I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
但这次情况更严峻，着急忙慌的老爸一个劲追赶牛群，导致受惊的牛群沿着梯田越跑越远，直奔地那头的沟壑。两头慌不择路的牛遭殃了，一头踩进了6米深的坑，一头滚下了超过30米的陡坡。
。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
GC thrashing in server-side rendering
Laura CressTechnology reporter